For Those With Highly Developed Worldviews

Check out the following test. I managed to get through it with only one bullet bitten, but I felt that my "stumbling point" was anything but:

You don't think that it is justifiable to base one's beliefs about the external world on a firm, inner conviction, paying no regard to the external evidence, or lack of it, for the truth or falsity of this conviction. But in the previous question you rejected evolutionary theory when the vast majority of scientists think both that the evidence points to its truth and that there is no evidence which falsifies it. Of course, many creationists claim that the evidential case for evolution is by no means conclusive. But in doing so, they go against scientific orthodoxy. So you've got to make a choice:

Bite the bullet and say there is evidence that evolution is not true, despite what the scientists say.

Most scientists hold to evolutionary theory not because of overwhelming evidence in favor of it, but because there is no other system without God that makes even a shred of sense. If there's so much "evidence" for evolution, my question is "Where is it?" The number of transitional forms ("missing link" animals that represent the shifting between the species) that we've found is slim to nill, even though if a widespread trans-species evolution occured there should be cogs and dats alongside dogs and cats in the fossil record.

Aside from the possibility of the Archaeoptrix, I haven't seen any evidence. Perhaps you can provide me with some?

-TRC